Comments on: Trust money used to ‘save’ struggling iPro, not for personal gain: Alves https://realestatemagazine.ca/trust-money-used-to-save-struggling-ipro-not-for-personal-gain-alves/ Canada’s premier magazine for real estate professionals. Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:02:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: anthony.perretta https://realestatemagazine.ca/trust-money-used-to-save-struggling-ipro-not-for-personal-gain-alves/#comment-23283 Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:02:31 +0000 https://realestatemagazine.ca/?p=40198#comment-23283 Real Estate Trust account money is not to be used to pay company expenses! They knew exactly what they were doing and had been doing it for a long time. The Real Estate Council of Ontario (and it was more than just one person) knew about this massive shortage of funds and chose to not take immediate action. Now Reco wants to take this seriously?! They apply to the courts to freeze assets! Seriously, these owners have stolen millions of dollars over a long period of time and continue to defend their theft of funds by saying that not a penny was used for personal gain. Do you really think they kept any assets with equity in their name? Seriously. RECO’s board of directors has failed to protect the public and their members.

]]>
By: angelina.white https://realestatemagazine.ca/trust-money-used-to-save-struggling-ipro-not-for-personal-gain-alves/#comment-23279 Fri, 26 Sep 2025 14:53:46 +0000 https://realestatemagazine.ca/?p=40198#comment-23279 It’s laughable that Alves claims these trust funds were used to “save” iPro, while what’s happening behind the scenes smells far worse. How coincidental that the brokerage’s assets were sold to “iCloud Realty” for $3 million — a name that sounds eerily close to Apple’s brand. Unless there’s a licensing deal with Apple, that feels like pure copyright theft or brand piggybacking.

And now we hear rumors that agents are being funneled into this “new” brokerage — as if we’re watching a play where roles are swapped but the same players remain. Perhaps “Reco” has a hand in orchestrating the charade: good cop/bad cop, pushing out one figurehead Joseph Richer, the RECO Registrar while riding shotgun in the shadows.

It begs the question: Why did he resign if he did nothing wrong? The optics suggest he was part of a cover-up. After all, under his watch, RECO cut a deal letting the iPro co-founders off without charges (despite millions missing from trust accounts).

The fact that Richer left right after the public outcry strongly implies there was pressure applied. It looks less like a clean exit and more like “You handle the fall guy while the real players stay hidden.”

So when Alves claims the trust money was used to “save the brokerage,” we have to ask: Was the rescue real—or was this a smokescreen to relocate the actors and assets under a new shell (iCloud?) while the damage is buried?

The bigger question: Why is no one going to jail for this? The manipulation of trust funds, the brand theft, the shifting of clients and agents — these aren’t mistakes. They’re moves. And they should be prosecuted as such.

The public and industry deserve clarity. Show the contracts, prove the chain of ownership, and let law enforcement do their job. Anything short of full transparency is complicity.

]]>